Organic food is immoral

You've completely ignored exactly 50% of their two points. Can you argue that oragnic food is not better for the environment? How can it not be with chemicals not entering the soil/food chain.

Also, I'm not sure the amount of food produced in the UK is that important, we have a surplus here and surely don't contribute much to the world supply.

Firstly the worst offender described by the Soil Association is nitrogen!

Also if you supported scientific GM food advancements where crops are typically engineered to become disease/pest/drought resistant, farmers could reduce the need for "chemicals" and pesticides.

Your second argument about UK surplus is alarming. Are we are so rich we can afford to have poor yields? Are we so rich we can afford to be wasteful? Many countries in this world rely on foreign food imports.

1. erm, yes?
2. Unfortunately we live in a capitalist world, GM crops are crippled by design, for example, to only last one year.
3. Yes, and we are a tiny population in a tiny country. Also, your "wasteful" is subjective.

The reason why I understand that GM crops are "crippled by design", i.e. do not seed is primarily so they do not reproduce and spread like wildfire. It's a sensible protection mechanism.

Despite our best intentions when we have introduced new plants or animals, things can go wrong. I think of Australia and its outbreaks of rabbits and what not as an example.

Hence I think this precautionary approach of GM food is fine and I prefer it over something they can ravage the world like some grey goo. Critics argue all the power goes to the "multinational agricultural biotechnology corporations". Oh pretty please. I guess the same people have no problem with Apple or Google or Microsoft.

Plus I prefer my citrus fruit without pips. Don't you?

Btw I don't think Britain is "tiny". West Sussex exports grain. I support technology to improve our productivity.